Références pour le module 4 – Violations de l’intégrité scientifique

Références

• ALLEA (2023). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity: Revised Edition 2023. Berlin. DOI 10.26356/ECOC
• Andrew Wakefield. (2021, December 12). In Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Andrew_Wakefield&oldid=1025405955
• Bailey, J. (2013, October 7). The Difference Between Copyright Infringement and Plagiarism. Plagiarism Today. Retrieved May 27, 2021, from  https://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2013/10/07/difference-copyright-infringement-plagiarism/
• Benderly, B. L. (2016, december 27). Can you rescue a damaged reputation? Science | AAAS. https://www.sciencemag.org/careers/2016/12/can-you-rescue-damaged-reputation 
• Bik, E. (2019, May 29). What is Research Misconduct? Part 2: Falsification. Science Integrity Digest. https://scienceintegritydigest.com/2019/05/28/what-is-research-misconduct-part-2-falsification/
• Bik, E. M., Casadevall, A., & Fang, F. C. (2016). The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications. mBio, 7(3). Article e00809-16. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00809-16
• Bogner, A., & Menz, W. (2006). Science crime. The Korean cloning scandal and the role of ethics. Science and Public Policy, 33(8), 601–612. https://doi.org/10.1093/spp/33.8.601
• Brown, N. J. L. & Heathers, J. A. J. (2017). The GRIM test: A simple technique detects numerous anomalies in the reporting of results in psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 363–369. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616673876
• Cabanac, G., Labbé, C., Magazinov, A. (2021) Tortured phrases: A dubious writing style emerging in science. Evidence of critical issues affecting established journals. arXiv, 2107.06751. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2107.06751 
• Carlisle, J. B. (2017). Data fabrication and other reasons for non-random sampling in 5087 randomised, controlled trials in anaesthetic and general medical journals. Anaesthesia, 72(8), 944–952. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.13938
• Catalogue of Bias Collaboration (d.) Biases Archive. Retrieved May 27, 2021, from  https://catalogofbias.org/biases/
• Davis, M., Riske-Morris, M., & Diaz, S. (2007). Causal Factors Implicated in Research Misconduct: Evidence from ORI Case Files. Science and Engineering Ethics, 13, 395–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-007-9045-2
• Enago (2018, September 17). Data Fabrication & Reproducibility: How Triangulation Offers Novel Solutions. https://www.enago.com/academy/data-fabrication-reproducibility-how-triangulation-offers-novel-solutions/
• Ex-VC of DU sent to jail for ‘plagiarism’, (2014, November 26). The Times of India.  https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/ex-vc-of-du-sent-to-jail-for-plagiarism-released/articleshow/45278628.cms
• Fanelli, D. (2009). How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data. PLOS ONE, 4(5), Article e5738. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005738
• Fanelli D, Costas R, Larivière V (2015) Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity. PLoS ONE 10(6): e0127556. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127556
• Godecharle, S., Fieuws, S., Nemery, B., & Dierickx, K. (2018). Scientists Still Behaving Badly? A Survey Within Industry and Universities. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(6), 1697–1717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9957-4
• Gopalakrishna G, ter Riet G, Vink G, Stoop I, Wicherts JM, Bouter LM (2022) Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands. PLoS ONE 17(2): e0263023. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263023
• Hwang Woo-suk. (2021, May 9). In Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hwang_Woo-suk&oldid=1022193400
• KNAW  Committee on Citation Practice. (2014). Correct citeren. Briefadvies Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen (KNAW). https://www.knaw.nl/publicaties/correct-citeren
• Labbé C., Grima N., Gautier T., Favier B., Byrne J. A. (2019) Semi-automated fact-checking of nucleotide sequence reagents in biomedical research publications: The Seek & Blastn PLoS ONE 14(3), e0213266. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213266 
• Lafollette, M. C. (2000). The Evolution of the “Scientific Misconduct” Issue: An Historical Overview (44535C). Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine, 224(4), 211–215.  https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/153537020022400405 
• Liu, X., Liu, S., Lee, S., & Magjuka, R. J. (2010). Cultural Differences in Online Learning: International Student Perceptions. Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 177–188. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.13.3.177 
• Metcalfe, J., Wheat, K., Munafò, M. & Parry, J. (2020) . Research Integrity: a landscape study. Vitae/UKRIO/UKRN.  https://www.ukri.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/UKRI-020920-ResearchIntegrityLandscapeStudy.pdf
• Nuijten, M. B., Hartgerink, C. H. J., van Assen, M. A. L. M., Epskamp, S., Wichert, J. M. (2016). The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013). Behav Res, 48, 1205–1226. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0664-2 
• Oransky, I., & Marcus, A. (2016, November 11). There’s a way to spot data fakery. All journals should be using it. The Watchdogs – STAT. https://www.statnews.com/2016/11/11/spot-data-fakery/
• ORI – The Office of Research Integrity (n.d.). Introduction to RCR: Chapter 9. Authorship and Publication. Retrieved May  27, 2021, from  https://ori.hhs.gov/content/Chapter-9-Authorship-and-Publication-Improper-practices 
• (2021, December 15). In Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Plagiarism&oldid=1024820082
• org. (n.d.). What is Plagiarism? Retrieved February 17, 2024, from http://www.plagiarism.org/article/what-is-plagiarism
• Polish professor could face three-year sentence for plagiarism. (2012, December 5). Polskie Radio dla Zagranicy. Retrieved May 27, 2021, from  http://archiwum.thenews.pl/1/9/Artykul/120508,Polish-professor-could-face-threeyear-sentence-for-plagiarism
• Resource Center for the STM Image Alterations & Duplications Working Group. Last visited 26 January 2024. https://www.stm-assoc.org/stm-image-alterations-duplications-resources/ 
• Schienke, E.W. (2021, Spring). BIOET 533: Ethical Dimensions of Renewable Energy and Sustainability Systems, 2.1. Falsification, Fabrication, Plagiarism. Retrieved May 27, 2021, from  https://www.e-education.psu.edu/bioet533/node/654
• Springer Link (n.d.). Publishing Ethics for Journals. (d.). Retrieved May 27, 2021, from  https://www.springer.com/gp/authors-editors/editors/publishing-ethics-for-journals/4176
• Stern, A. V. (2018, March 21). Management researcher admits to falsification, resigns. Retraction https://retractionwatch.com/2018/03/21/marketing-researcher-admits-to-falsification-resigns/
• Tijdink JK, Bouter LM, Veldkamp CL, van de Ven PM, Wicherts JM, Smulders YM. Personality Traits Are Associated with Research Misbehavior in Dutch Scientists: A Cross-Sectional Study. PLoS One. 2016 Sep 29;11(9):e doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163251. PMID: 27684371; PMCID: PMC5042531. 
• Titus SL, Wells JA, Rhoades LJ (2008) Repairing research integrity. Nature 453: 980–982. https://doi.org/10.1038/453980a
• Yoshitaka Fujii. (2021, April 15). In Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Yoshitaka_Fujii&oldid=1017945341