home-icon
  • checkmark Responsible conduct of research
    • checkmark Design and conduct
    • checkmark Design and methodology
    • checkmark Possible flaws in a study design
    • checkmark Preregistration and registered reports
    • checkmark Reproducibility and replicability of research
    • checkmark Statistics in research
    • checkmark Research funding
    • checkmark Research Data Management (RDM)
    • checkmark FAIR data principles for research data
    • checkmark Data Management Plan
    • checkmark Reporting results
    • checkmark Presenting your data
    • checkmark Image processing
    • checkmark Authorship
    • checkmark Author affiliation
    • checkmark Citation and referencing
    • checkmark Open access to publications
    • checkmark The quality of a journal
    • checkmark Peer review
    • checkmark Preprints
    • checkmark Novelty of your work
    • checkmark The value of negative results
  • checkmark Declaration of conflict of interest
  • checkmark Science communication
  • checkmark Research(er) evaluation and assessment
  • checkmark References for module 3 - Good Academic Practices

Author affiliation

jumping-icon base

Author affiliation

Besides author names, publications contain author affiliations, providing more information on the university/faculty/department where each of the authors is affiliated with. An author can have multiple affiliations, for example in case where he or she is affiliated with multiple entities within the same university, or alternatively when someone is appointed at multiple institutions.

When listing affiliations, it is important to note that these should reflect where the research has taken place. Although it is tempting to include as many affiliations as possible, researchers should be aware that an affiliation should only be claimed if the actual work and research underlying the publication have been performed at the institution(s) listed in the affiliation.

So why is a correct author affiliation important?

In addition to help identifying authors (in case of multiple researchers having the same name) and giving recognition to the host institution, it also assigns responsibility to the institutions involved as it directs the readers of the work to ‘who to contact’ in case of questions and/or problems with the research, for example with regards to ethics and research integrity of the work. In addition, correct affiliations are of key importance for identifying potential (financial) conflicts of interests.

mindthegap

Providing a wrong affiliation, thereby failing to give credit to the appropriate institution. A common mistake is the situation in which a researcher worked in institution A, and after ending the experimental work, but before having the work published, moved to institution B. Although one might feel it makes sense to provide the affiliation of institution B on the publication, given this is the current institution of the researcher, this is not correct as the actual work was not performed in institution B. As such, only institution A should be listed. In order to illustrate that the researcher has switched institutions, the current address can be listed in a footnote.

mindthegap

Providing a false affiliation, this in order to manipulate the perception and credibility of the research and thus increase the chances to have it published. In addition, being a student at your university does not necessarily mean that your work can be published as originating from this university. Research activities that have been performed on the researcher’s own initiative and without any supervision by the host institution should not be attributed to the university.

mindthegap

Failing to disclose a relevant affiliation: researchers might get into the situation that omitting a certain affiliation might actually help to get the work published. This is often related to the concealing of a conflict of interest, which is of course an unacceptable practice.

mindthegap

When to think about this?

Affiliations are important to show which institutions are involved in the research project. This is applicable every time one communicates about the research project and it is as such relevant throughout the project:

  • When submitting a research proposal to apply for funding
  • For progress reports on the research (for example in the form of presentation at other institutions or congresses).
  • When communicating at the end of the research project (in many cases in the form of a publication).
  • During follow up after finalising the research.